Caty McNally vs Angela Fita Boluda Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 10:37 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. McNally vs A. Fita Boluda

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: McNally 1 - 0 Boluda
They have played 2 sets in total, with Caty McNally winning 2 and Angela Fita Boluda winning 0. The last match between Caty McNally and Angela Fita Boluda was at the W75 Brescia, 29-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Caty McNally getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McNally | 1 |
| Boluda | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Brescia(05-29-25)
C. McNally vs A. F. Boluda H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,334,271 | Career Prize Money | $2,400 |
| 60.24% (197-130) | Career Total W/L | 60.67% (324-210) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 47.62% (10-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. McNally vs A. F. Boluda Match Preview:
- What can be said about second serve performance? Boluda has a noticeable edge, winning 40.1% of points compared to Mc Nally's 31.96% over the past six months.
- In terms of returning, how do both players compare? Boluda has secured 49.1% of their opponent’s second serve points, while Mc Nally has 53.88%. For first serve returns, Boluda and Mc Nally show comparable skill at around 35%.
- When under pressure, particularly with break points, Boluda demonstrates superior defensive skills, saving 48.29% of breakpoints faced versus Mc Nally’s 36.63%.
- Performance over the past year highlights Boluda’s stronger track record, with a match win rate of 61.04%, whereas Mc Nally has not recorded any wins in their outings during this period.
- Which surface benefits Boluda the most? Performance data shows Boluda excels on clay with a 63% win rate, though struggles on indoor hard courts at just 17%.
- Analyzing opponent quality reveals Boluda contends with competitors averaging a rank of 327.4, which signals competitive tournament exposure.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Boluda has an evident upper hand, having won 60% of such sets in the last year, compared to Mc Nally's lack of success in these situations.
- In recent event-specific statistics, it’s important to recognize Mc Nally's slightly better breakpoint conversion capability at 45.15%, as opposed to Boluda’s 39.02%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing both players' recent performances and statistics, Boluda emerges as the more consistent and seasoned competitor. With a notable advantage in second serve points, improved breakpoint saves, and a solid track record on clay, Boluda presents as a formidable opponent.
Mc Nally, albeit showing a slight edge in breakpoint conversions, falls short in match wins and deciding set performances over the last year, hinting at a potential struggle against a more experienced player like Boluda.
Considering the comparative strengths and historical performance trends, Boluda is anticipated to be the likely winner of the upcoming match. His greater experience, coupled with strong play under pressure, positions him as the frontrunner in this contest.
Caty McNally vs Angela Fita Boluda Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. McNally vs A. F. Boluda H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:4:30 | Average Match Time | 1:4:30 |
| 79% (33/42) | 1st Serve % | 73% (32/44) |
| 82% (27/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 44% (4/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (25/44) | Return Points Win % | 26% (11/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. McNally Recent Matches Played
A. F. Boluda Recent Matches Played

C. McNally vs A. F. Boluda Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.24% (197/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.67% (324/210) |
| 58.40% (438/312) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.10% (714/474) |
| 53.72% (3649/3143) | Games Win/Loss | 55.41% (5899/4748) |
| 55.19% (85/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.52% (39/30) |
| 58.97% (46/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.22% (280/170) |
| 71.15% (37/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (5/10) |
| 67.44% (29/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 601 | Aces Total | 708 |
| 0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1315 | Total Double Faults | 1371 |
| 1:32:18 | Average Match Time | 1:18:38 |
| 332.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 423.52 |
| 65% (13438/20584) | 1st Serve % | 64% (16915/26425) |
| 63% (8464/13438) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10597/16915) |
| 44% (3165/7146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4328/9509) |
| 50% (1311/2624) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1760/3675) |
| 46% (9673/20831) | Return Points Win % | 47% (12993/27690) |
| 50.00% (19/19) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.75% (48/43) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 70.34% (102/43) | Challenger W/L | 57.73% (183/134) |
| 69.57% (16/7) | Futures W/L | 65.73% (140/73) |
| 60% (194/322) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (321/518) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (28/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (41/91) |
| 53% (54/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (66/134) |
| 85% (202/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (324/288) |
| 15% (202/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (324/36) |
| 20% (125/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (208/35) |